7 October, 2016
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its case of Sasan Power Limited v. North American Coal Corporation India Private Limited on 24 -8-2016 has held that the scope of enquiry under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is confined only to the question – whether the arbitration agreem...
6 June, 2014
The Supreme Court of India has, on 28th of May, 2014 declined to accept the proposition that whenever a contract is alleged to be void ab-initio, the courts exercising jurisdiction under Section 8 and Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are rendered powerless to refer the disputes to arbitration. The Apex Court in this regard relied on an earlier judgement in...
By Sudish Sharma & Nikhil Singal
The original text of Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which voids agreements made (or containing clauses) in restraint of legal proceedings, has been subject to many amendments over the years. In fact, in 1997, the original Section 28 was replaced with a new one, after taking into consideration the...
By Shikha S. Jaipuriar
The general law of contract recognizes promises made for consideration as legally enforceable agreements. However, it frowns upon certain promises and prohibits their enforcement, including those that are in restraint of legal proceedings.
Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 contains one of the seven governing principles to determine when an agr...
© Copyright 1985-2016 Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, All Rights Reserved.