Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan 律师事务所An ISO 9001 / 27001 certified law firm

知识产权新闻

搜索 起始日 到期日
Trademarks – Phonetic similarity when word used as suffix in one mark and as prefix in another

4th September

Bombay High Court on 2-8-2017, in the case of Pidilite Industries Limited v. Poma-Ex Products, observed that there existed high degree of phonetic similarity between the mark of the plaintiff “FEVIKWIK” and the mark of the defendant “KWIKHEAL”. The Court issued an interim injunction in favour of the Plaintif...

Global injunction on display of search engine results

4th September

Google has on 24th of July brought an action before the US District Court (Northern District of California-San Jose Division) to prevent enforcement of the Canadian Supreme Court Order that prohibits Google from publishing within the US, search result information about the contents of the internet.

The Canadian Supreme Cour...

Copyright in literary work authored by director of company

4th September

The Delhi High Court on 4-8-2017, in the case of Neetu Singh v. Rajiv Saumitra granted an interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff. The suit was pertaining to copyright infringement in a literary work.

The defendant contended that the literary work was produced by the plaintiff during the course of her employmen...

Right to Privacy – Supreme Court’s landmark judgement


The Basics

How the reference came about?

- It was a reference from the Aadhar case.
- There was an apparent conflict between the judgments of the Supreme Court in MP Sharma case (8-judge bench) & Kharak Singh case (6 judge bench) on the one hand, versus more than 6-7 d...

Doctrine of equivalents & prosecution history - UK Supreme Court clarifies

24th July, 2017

Summary


The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has recently passed its judgment in the case of the Actavis Vs. Eli Lilly and Company , on 12th July, 2017. This judgment has very wide ramifications on some of the most critical principles of UK Patent Law. Apart from clarifying the applicability of the doct...

Examination of national phase patent application filed after specified period

24th July, 2017

Summary


In recent judgment of 10th July 2017, the Delhi High Court in the case of the Trytan Medical INC. vs. Union of India, has taken to task, the Patent Office, for its failure to adhere to the orders and direction of a Superior Court/ Tribunal. In this case the High Court has directed the Patent Office...

Trademarks – Effect of part of mark being generic and common to particular trade


21 June 2017

Observing differences, including differences in trade dress, label and get up of the two trade-names – ‘Pinch of Spice’ and ‘Pinch of Salt’, the Delhi High Court has on 24-05-2017 vacated the interim injunction it earlier granted in favour of the plaintiff. The marks were also found to be dis-similar phonetically...

Trademark infringement – Distinction in services provided, is material


21 June 2017

A Single Judge of the Delhi High Court has on 22-05-2017 vacated the earlier ex-parte interim injunction in a case involving trademark infringement where the mark “PINDROP” was used by the plaintiffs for recording studio business (class 41) and the mark “PINDROP MUSIC” was used by the defendants for an online applicati...

Exhaustion of patent right when patentee sells patented product


21 June 2017

The US Supreme Court has held that patentee’s decision to sell a product exhausts all of its patent rights in that item, regardless of any restrictions the patentee purports to impose. It was also held that an authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the US Patent Act. Th...

Trademark infringement – Similarity of marks to be considered first


15 May 2017

Observing that the marks FERANTA and INTAS’ FERINTAS are sufficiently distinguishable and does not satisfy Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court has refused to grant an interim injunction in favour of the Plaintiffs in a trademark infringement and passing off suit.

The Court in it...

Trademarks – German origin word which is not indicative of business, is not generic


18 May 2017

Taking note of the fact that plaintiff had acquired a distinctive reputation and goodwill of its own under the trade names “ASIAN HAUS” and “SUSHI HAUS” for its food delivery outlets, Delhi High Court has restrained the defendants by an interim injunction from using the name “HAUS” for latter’s food de...

Patents – Correction under Section 78


22 May 2017

Delhi High Court has set aside the ‘deemed to be withdrawn’ status of a patent application and restored the Indian National Phase application. The issue involved incorrect mention of the number of the patent application in Form 18 as well as in its covering letter, and absence of communication from the department seeking correction...

Page(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
若需要较早的文档请参阅档案部分
搜索 团队成员
搜索 团队成员
按名字字母顺序
A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J
K|L|M|N|O|P|Q|R|S|T
U|V|W|X|Y|Z
Enter at least a name or a keyword to search